Trainee Evaluation of Faculty | PAACS Workflow Forms

Please select the faculty member you are evaluating.(Required)

If you have not had any formal teaching interactions with this faculty, you do not need fill out an evaluation. Please submit this form with "No" selected to ensure the system counts an appropriate number of evaluations.

The longer evaluation will appear if you select 'Yes'.

Have you had formal teaching with this faculty member?(Required)

Yes

1-5 Rating Questions

Each question below will let you select an answer, 1-5, with 1 being worst and 5 being best. The text next to each rating is meant to be illustrative. It is NOT a description of what that rating must look like.

Please select a summary rating, 1-5, of this faculty member, where 1 is poorest and 5 is best:(Required)

1. (PAACS may need to reassess this faculty member's suitability as a teacher.)

2. (They need improvement in many areas.)

3. (They need to improve, but I can see where they are doing well.)

4. (While they are human, their good traits as faculty outweigh the bad.)

5. (They are an excellent faculty member; I truly have no critiques of them.)

How does this faculty member engage in spiritual life within the program? Consider their physical presence as well as the way they act as a Christ-follower:(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. They don't

2. They do the "bare minimum"

3. They're present, but it's pretty clear it's low priority

4. They're active and interested in our spiritual life

5. They're a leader in our program's spiritual life

How does this faculty member engage their spiritual life with those outside the program? (Praying with others, witnessing to others, talking about their faith)(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. They don't, at all

2. It's very infrequent

3. They do it occasionally, as they remember

4. They actively integrate their faith with their interactions with others

5. They are a model in how to witness to and minister to others

How would you describe this faculty member's teaching style in formal teaching settings?(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. They either don’t prepare, or struggle greatly

2. They prepare a bit, but it is usually superficial and they are boring

3. They are good at engaging us, but they rarely provide more than superficial content

4. They aren’t a very engaging lecturer, but they provide interesting and in-depth material

5. They are great with formal teaching settings: prepared, engaging, in-depth material, and good quizzes.

How have you seen or heard this faculty member work on increasing their knowledge?(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. They don’t seem to actively pursue increasing their knowledge.

2. They seem to just meet the minimum requirements – an occasional CME or a Grand Rounds every few months.

3. Sometimes they seek out colleagues for more information. They pursue the occasional CME and come to Grand Rounds once a month or so.

4. I see them regularly at Grand Rounds and are not surprised when they reference a recent CME they have done.

5. They actively seek out opinions, experiences, and help from colleagues. You would be surprised if they weren’t at almost every Grand Rounds and CME you hear of.

How effectively does this faculty member teach during ward rounds, whether formal or informal?(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. They never seem to do teaching rounds – or if they do, they don’t seem to teach.

2. They occasionally (maybe 1-2 times a month) do some sort of teaching round. They don’t engage me when they do.

3. While infrequent, their teaching rounds are engaging. I look forward to our rounds together.

4. They do teaching rounds often, but don’t engage much beyond telling me what to write down, or the occasional differential diagnosis or management plan.

5. Every opportunity is an opportunity to teach with them, and they engage with me frequently during our rounds together, including leading discussions with me on pathology or management strategies.

How would you describe this faculty member's teaching and presence before, during, and after surgery?(Required)

N/A - I have not engaged with this faculty member in a way that allows me to assess this.

1. If we talk, it’s because it’s required. I’m not sure if they don’t want to teach or if they don’t like me.

2. They involve me a bit in everything, and explain a little about what they’re doing or what they plan to do.

3. We discuss major cases thoroughly beforehand, and they let me do some cases myself; we discuss some cases post-op as well.

4. We have robust discussions on almost all cases beforehand. They let me do many cases, and will give feedback or demonstrations of new techniques when I do. They’ll give some feedback consistently after cases.

5. We discuss cases beforehand in detail, and I can tell they are progressively relinquishing the procedures to me, though they engage fully to supervise and take responsibility. They give solid evaluations after procedures and get my input on the case and post-op plan.

How well does this faculty member work with other faculty members within the program?(Required)

Poorly

Average

Very well

How well does this faculty member work with othes OUTSIDE of the program?(Required)

Poorly

Average

Very well

This may include hospital administration, hospital staff, regional organizations, PAACS, etc.

Additional Questions

I appreciate and trust feedback from this faculty member, even when it is challenging.(Required)

Yes

Please rate how often this faculty member engages in these various forms of feedback. Note that no faculty member is perfect. Your responses may be discarded if all of them are "strongly agree" or "strongly disagree".(Required)

	Almost Never	Rarely	Occasionally	Often	Very frequently
Negative/critical feedback
Positive/encouraging feedback
Shouts while giving feedback
Gives negative/critical feedback in front of others
Gives negative/critical feedback privately
Gives feedback in a timely manner
Gives quality, accurate, actionable feedback

Please rate how well the faculty member shows these various methods they care. Note that no faculty member is perfect. Your responses may be discarded if all of them are "strongly agree" or "strongly disagree".(Required)

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
They give me advice.
They give extra teaching or tutoring sessions.
They want me to ask questions, whenever I have them.
They teach whenever they have the opportunity.
They ask after my family and/or important events in my life.
They ask how I am, showing through action that they will help with challenges.
They feel like a brother/sister in Christ.

Do you have any comments you would like to leave regarding this faculty member? PAACS administration will review all comments to ensure there is no identifying information before forwarding on to this faculty.(Required)

Yes

Please leave your comments here. If you do not want to write any comments, you may submit the evaluation. Thank you!